Building Tomorrow's Youth, 2/20

Young people matter.

That's why we want the community to join us for this seminar on Wednesday, February 20, to find out just how important every adult is in the lives of our young people.

At Montrose Church, we believe that adults have unlimited influence in the lives of young people and also have an obligation to be positive role models of unconditional love, encouragement, and compassion. We have the opportunity to be "asset builders" and nurture young people into productive, healthy adults. It's an important job - and it requires intentionality.

Building Tomorrow’s Youth is a seminar that focuses on tools to equip adults to ensure that children and adolescents have access to the positive relationships, opportunities, and guidance they need to thrive in a challenging world. At Montrose Church we make it a priority to ensure that all young people in our congregation and community have the positive experiences they need to grow up healthy, caring, and responsible.

The research findings of over a decade of research by Search Institute have determined that there are 40 Developmental Assets that are building blocks for the healthy development of all youth regardless of gender, race, socioeconomic status, or location. This seminar will acquaint you with all 40 assets, including those that only the church community can develop.

When: Wednesday, February 20, 6:30 - 8:00 p.m. (Register online now)
Where: Church Ministry Office, 2678 Honolulu Avenue, Montrose 91020 (map)
Childcare: Provided at the Montrose Church main campus, 2409 Florencita Drive, Montrose 91020 (map)
Contact: Kim Villa, volunteers@montrosechurch.org

Posted on Sat, January 19, 2013 by Kim Villa filed under

6 comments (Add your own)

1. Gloria Gama-Tafoya wrote:: Looking forward to it. Thank you for offering this opportunity.
Mon, January 7, 2013 @ 9:04 AM
2. Annie Bundarin wrote:: Any notes and/or recording of the original
class I missed??
Fri, January 25, 2013 @ 11:07 AM
3. Simmi wrote:: Dear Julian, it had been a very long time not talking to you, your good and citcrial article deserves every politicians, church or non- church leaders,laymen, journalists and NGO peoples etc etc to read it. You have a very in-depth understandings and analysis of those very complicated power dynamics in the context of the faith seeking. Except Ho Pak Leung, I know the other two candidates personally and observed them with a more inside knowledge and life experiences, so happened, they are also CUHK alumni. From my humble knowledge and understanding, the " faith " being revealed by Rev. So as you mentioned with this particular case,to my judgement,is a distorted picture of Christian Faith, NOT the authentic one. No one in the world, that they can able to claim themselves as represent the true and unfailing picture of Christ's love, unconditional acceptances and hope. Continue your good writing and very thought provoking journey. Take care, Mau Chi wang繆熾宏 96441260, mauchiwang@netvigator.com
Tue, April 2, 2013 @ 12:41 AM
4. variable life insurance wrote:: âThe task force understands this proposal to be a fairly innocuous change, one that is a âwin-winâ for both those who want to retain the historic Southern Baptist Convention name, and for those who want a more contemporary and non-regional name.âDoesnât this measure have the potential to divide SBC ranks? As you note, on one hand there will be those âwho want to retain the historicâ, while those âwho want a more contemporaryâ move forward separately. Until recent years, historic and contemporary flowed together for the cause of Christ. We used to accommodate both under the same umbrella after all, Jesus is the eternal contemporary. In my area, this development was welcomed with open arms by young, restless and reformed (YRR) church planters. Their social media is abuzz today with great joy, while the silent majority is still largely silent. Perhaps YRR church planters have simply been handed a compromise from SBC leadership even though they didn t really need it since they have been using cool church names not describing affiliation for years. Some of us are still trying to assess where the denominational âwin-winâ is in this. Is this really about âSouthernâ?
Mon, April 8, 2013 @ 8:50 PM
5. cheap life insurance wrote:: âThe task force understands this proposal to be a fairly innocuous change, one that is a âwin-winâ for both those who want to retain the historic Southern Baptist Convention name, and for those who want a more contemporary and non-regional name.âDoesnât this measure have the potential to divide SBC ranks? As you note, on one hand there will be those âwho want to retain the historicâ, while those âwho want a more contemporaryâ move forward separately. Until recent years, historic and contemporary flowed together for the cause of Christ. We used to accommodate both under the same umbrella after all, Jesus is the eternal contemporary. In my area, this development was welcomed with open arms by young, restless and reformed (YRR) church planters. Their social media is abuzz today with great joy, while the silent majority is still largely silent. Perhaps YRR church planters have simply been handed a compromise from SBC leadership even though they didn t really need it since they have been using cool church names not describing affiliation for years. Some of us are still trying to assess where the denominational âwin-winâ is in this. Is this really about âSouthernâ?
Mon, April 8, 2013 @ 8:50 PM
6. Ricky wrote:: http://www.searchinsurancedeals.com/|car insurance quote 817 http://www.searchedmedsdeals.com/|sildenafil 78101 http://www.locateinsurdeals.com/|new jersey car insurance jsaw http://www.medspricechart.com/|viagra xanax =-) http://www.mdicamentsenligne.fr/|Acheter du cialis :]]]
Sat, May 18, 2013 @ 3:33 AM

Add a New Comment

Your Name:

Your Email/URL (Optional):

Your Comment:

Enter the code you see below:
code

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.